Court approval of a settlement proposal to permit a distribution of insurance proceeds in circumstances where investors relied upon advice from financial advisers

Court approval of a settlement proposal to permit a distribution of insurance proceeds in circumstances where investors relied upon advice from financial advisers

Use of section 479(3) Corporations Act and cl 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) by a liquidator to obtain orders that it would be a proper course for the liquidator to consent to a settlement proposal put forward by the Insurer of a company in liquidation
In RJ Dean-Willcocks as liquidator of Re Navra Group Pty Ltd (in liq), (Federal Court of Australia, NSD 1061 of 2015) and, Christopher John Palmer as liquidator of Re Navra Group Pty Ltd (in liq), (Federal Court of Australia, NSD 1061 of 2015), liquidators of Navra Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (the “Company”) made an application to the Federal Court for Judicial advice pursuant to s 479(3) of the Corporations Act and/or cl 90-15 – 90-20 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule. The application involved obtaining approval for an assessment and pay out scheme for over 100 claimants using insurance proceeds pursuant to a number of professional indemnity insurance policies in the context where those claimants have alleged that they were negligently advised to make certain investments which led to them sustaining large financial losses. This was a commercially significant matter which impacted (and had the effect, in a practical sense, of settling) several Court proceedings including Supreme Court proceedings in New South Wales, Supreme Court proceedings in Queensland, group proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales and class action proceedings in the Federal Court.

Claims against the Company and limited insurance monies

During the course of the liquidation of the Company, the liquidators became aware of over 100 claims which had been made by former clients of the Company and which had been received by the Company’s insurer over several years. The Company’s remaining assets comprised certain limited claims-made Civil Liability Insurance Policies that were issued by the Insurer over a number of years.

Significantly, there were several complicated issues including the following:.

  • The value of the claims that had been made far outweighed the total financial limits of insurance cover under the policies
  • a large number of the claims were statute barred;
  • a number of Court proceedings were stayed or were in abeyance until the outcome of the application for judicial advice.

It was in this context that the Insurer proposed to the Applicant liquidator a voluntary settlement scheme whereby claims that have been received would be assessed with a view to enabling the former clients to be paid some money from the proceeds of insurance. In order to consider whether to accept the Insurer’s offer, the Applicant liquidator sought judicial advice pursuant to what was formally contained in section 479(3) of the Corporations Act.

As part of the proceedings before the Federal Court, the Court ordered that advertisements be taken out in certain newspapers inviting:

"any person who considers they may have a claim against the Company arising from alleged breach of contract, negligence, breach of duty, including fiduciary duty, misleading or deceptive conduct or other wrongful conduct in the provision of financial planning advice to submit a claim to [the Liquidator’s] solicitors by (a specified date)".

At the same time, an Insurance Monies Distribution Scheme document including deeds of release was developed and approved by the Court.

More Articles